Auto Accidents and Private Injury Law Suits

If you’ve been injured in an auto incident, you can file a personal harm suit versus the individual who caused the car accident to obtain an award of injuries. In a car accident suit, both you and your law firm will try to show that the motorist of the other auto caused the incident due to failing to take notice or take sensible care.

To establish that a person wasn’t driving a car with reasonable care, you should confirm that there was:

  • The lawful responsibility to take care
  • A breach of this responsibility
  • A direct relationship between the car accident and the harm.

Obtaining an award depends on what the other man or woman should have anticipated at the time of the accident and not what actually took place.

Duty of Care

Cases involving auto mishaps normally concentrate on whether the other man or woman had a duty of care as well as applied care during driving his or her automobile.

A specific quality of attention should be attained when operating a vehicle. To fulfill this norm or responsibility of attention, drivers should:

  • Operate the automobile at a realistic rate of speed
  • Keep the automobile under correct control
  • Look out for all circumstances that could result in an accident

In addition, these law suits also focus on whether the other driver’s actions produced an unreasonable risk. Generally, if a danger may be realistically expected, it should be averted.

Precisely What Caused the Accidental Injuries?

For a driver to be to blame for your accidental injuries, careless conduct should have added and brought on your incidents. For instance, a pedestrian wounded by a driver must confirm that she wasn’t at fault, and the motorist’s actions triggered her damage. If the pedestrian’s reckless actions caused the harm, or when certain intervening power caused the harm, then a motorist might not be held responsible for the pedestrian’s injuries.

Also, a practical individual should be able to expect a risk of injury to other people. For instance, a motorist must take sensible care of individuals walking across the street in a crosswalk.

Intervening Causes

A man or woman may not be held accountable for the plaintiff’s wounds if another action took place to bring about the crash or injury. For instance: A motorist’s carelessness caused a collision with another vehicle, that brings a law enforcement officer to the car accident. One more accident occurs and the official is wounded.

Who is responsible for the officer’s damage? The negligent motorist of the first crash or the irresponsible driver of the second driver? The irresponsible motorist of the second incident is answerable because his activity caused the officer’s harm.

If there is an assumption of risk, a person acknowledges that an injury might occur in any given situation as well as accepts the risk. This is often accepted either by specially agreeing not to hold any individual chargeable for any ensuing injury or by voluntarily acting following being informed of the potential risks.

The emergency doctrine defense is used if a person is confronted by a crisis needing immediate action and does not decide regarding what do, and cannot be found irresponsible if they do not pick a course of action that would have had an improved consequence.

For example, a driver’s brakes suddenly turn into inoperable, due to no fault of her own. She cannot be found negligent for hitting the auto in front of her automobile instead of using the emergency brake, because it was a crisis situation.

For help with any kind of personal accident injury, consult with a wrongful death lawyer Columbus. A Columbus Georgia personal injury attorney might be able to get you the compensation you need. Find a Columbus Georgia medical malpractice attorney for a free preliminary consultation.

Filing bankruptcy

With so many consumers facing financial problems for various reasons finding the right California bankruptcy Attorney is now become more important than ever.  So in your Bankruptcy Attorney search consider a few things prior to selecting lawyer that can help you with your bankruptcy filing. Whether you have to file chapter 7 or chapter 13 you need to consider the experience, convenience and affordability of your California Bankruptcy Attorney. When you believe you have to file bankruptcy you should be able to find a local Bankruptcy Attorney on the internet or in your local Yellow Pages to set up a free consultation. Even though filing bankruptcy can be done on-line these days, most California Bankruptcy Attorneys would like to meet with you personally. In California if you have to file chapter 13 bankruptcy your bankruptcy Attorney must meet with you personally. If you need to file chapter 7 bankruptcy typically you can discuss your situation over the phone with your Bankruptcy Attorney, since filing chapter 7 is much less complicated. When it comes to affordability, most California Bankruptcy Attorneys will accept payments until you can afford to file bankruptcy, but beware of Bankruptcy Lawyers who will accept $100.00 to start.  They will take your money and do absolutely nothing but try to get you off the street. Typically, Chapter 7 bankruptcy fees are paid in full prior to your attorney filing your bankruptcy. When filing chapter 13 you can pay part of your attorney fees up front and the remainder of your bankruptcy fees through the chapter 13 plan. We asked a few California Bankruptcy Lawyers from the Law Offices of Zhou & Chini about the practice of collecting $100.00 from a client, and what someone filing bankruptcy can expect from a Bankruptcy Attorney for $100.00. “Absolutely nothing but problems “says James D. Zhou, senior partner and California Bankruptcy Attorney of 11 years. When we spoke to partner Ron Chini, he stated the problem is that $100 is just a way to get a client committed to filing bankruptcy when they’re not really ready so they don’t go elsewhere. Chini goes on to say “these people need help with their financial situation, paying a bankruptcy lawyer $100.00 get’s then nothing but trouble”. Most consumers are looking for a deal when shopping for the right Bankruptcy Attorney and think they found it when they can pay $100.00 to one and hand off some paperwork. Unfortunately, not all California Bankruptcy Attorneys have the consumer’s best interest at heart. “Get em in and get em out” is the attitude most Bankruptcy Attorneys have when it comes to chapter 7 bankruptcy.  When you find a Bankruptcy Attorney you are comfortable with check out these five things.

1)      Look your Bankruptcy Attorney up on the California State Bar website for any complaints.

2)      Ask your Bankruptcy Attorney for references from clients who have filed bankruptcy with him.

3)      Make sure your Bankruptcy Attorney has experience filing chapter 7, chapter 13 and chapter 11.

4)      Ask your Bankruptcy Attorney if they will be the one actually doing the bankruptcy filing.

5)      Is your Attorney is a member of NACBA (National Association of Bankruptcy Attorneys)?

Once you see that you are comfortable with your California Bankruptcy Attorney and they have the experience, reputation, and full knowledge of bankruptcy laws should you then hire them to file your bankruptcy. Let’s face it; Bankruptcy Attorneys are everywhere, so finding the right one is critical to the outcome and your future after filing bankruptcy. Additionally, filing bankruptcy is the last thing someone wants to do. Not only should your Bankruptcy Attorney be someone you feel you can trust; but someone who has the credentials, references and price point you’re looking for when filing bankruptcy. If you are shopping around for a California Bankruptcy Attorney in Orange, Riverside, Los Angeles, San Bernardino or San Diego counties then you should consider the content of this article and stay away from $100 Bankruptcy Attorneys in California. If you want bankruptcy help or are just looking for bankruptcy information then visit

Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury – Do You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer?

Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury – Do You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer?


Before you decide to hire a personal injury attorney, you should definitely consider whether it is actually worth your time to do so. While many injuries are worth the time, effort, and money to seek damages, many are not. When considering whether you need a lawyer, it is important that you compare the potential benefits to the costs of actually going through the entire process. By doing this, you can make sure your strategy is as effective as possible. What follows should give you some strategies that you can use to determine whether an injury lawyer is worth your time.


There are many things to consider when hiring an attorney. The main one is cost. If the damages you will accept from the defendant are less than the actual cost of an attorney, as well as the cost of your own time, there is no benefit to hiring one. Because of this, your personal injury case may simply not be worth bothering with. However, if the damages you will receive are greater, then it is likely to be a good idea to get yourself proper legal representation. However, figuring out the damages that you may receive can be tricky.


The easiest damages to figure out are known as special damages. This is because they are easy to define. These types of damages include money that you have provably lost due to your injury, such as resulting bills and lost wages. General damages are more difficult. This is because they are non-economic damages, including any emotional losses or losses of physical capability. You may also receive punitive damages in some cases. However, punitive damages are only issued when your injury results from negligence or malice. Your personal injury attorney may or may not be able to get you these damages.


Because of the various types of damages that you might receive, it can be tricky to figure out whether or not you need a personal injury lawyer. However, you should be able to estimate the special damages fairly easily. Once you do that, consider the most conservative estimate of the amount of other damages you might receive. Next, do some research to figure out exactly how much money legal representation will cost you, and how much the loss of time will cost as well. With this information on your side, you should be able to make an informed comparison and decide whether you would prefer to pursue your case.


San Diego Personal Injury Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer San Diego, San Diego Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury Attorney San Diego, San Diego auto accident lawyer